Posts Tagged ‘ desired outcome ’

Arise, consciousness!

Posted by: Amy on April 17, 2012

No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.  Albert Einstein

We have been looking at Amabile and Kramer’s research on how to give workers a vision for the meaning in their work.  In our last blog we looked at catalysts and nourishers – methods that we as managers can use to help our employees see the contributions they make in our organizations.  We also looked at a daily checklist to use as a guideline as we infuse our employees with a sense of purpose, engagement, and productivity.

However, we would be remiss if we didn’t look at the inhibitors to that meaning and progress.   (more…)

2 Steps Forward and 3 Steps Back Make Jack a Very Dull Boy

Posted by: Amy on April 5, 2012

In our last blog we found that what we know isn’t necessarily translating into what we do in the workplace.  The research we looked at last time proves that we have to close the gap between what we know about motivating employees and what we actually practice.

With over 12,000 diary entries from 238 employees, Amabile and Kramer discovered that progress and setbacks influence all three aspects of inner work life:  (more…)

No Fear

Posted by: Amy on March 30, 2012

Fear can energize behavior and accelerate performance – military basic training, merit scholarships, regular paychecks to feed your family; these all serve as motivators that involve certain levels of fear that impact our behavior.  At the same time we know that fear does not inspire loyalty, excellence, or satisfaction.  Harvard Business Review spotlights the The Progress Principle: Using Small Wins to Ignite Joy, Engagement, and Creativity at Work.

Early in their 14+ years of research Amabile and Kramer found that a fundamental driver of creative, productive performance is that employee’s inner work life.  This combination of motivations, emotions and perceptions that color how positively they see their organization, co-workers, managers, work, and even themselves greatly impacts their level of achievement. (more…)

Modesty is the Best Policy

Posted by: Elizabeth on December 16, 2011

Charalambos A.Vlachoutsicos is an adjunct professor in the International MBA Program at Athens University of Economics and Business.  He frequently shares his 30 years of business expertise in Harvard Business Review, and most recently shared how to cultivate engaged employees.

There are several things we know about management – most of us have been around the block a few times.  We know that teams with synergy and a real sense of empowerment enhance an organization’s effectiveness and that a top-down, rigid hierarchy seldom works.  However, (more…)

Put Away the Putter and Select Your Driver

Posted by: Elizabeth on December 6, 2011

In Performance Improvement, Jerry Harbour, PhD, shares a method for performance measurement that centers on the 3D’s: design, data, and display.  We are exploring his research on design through identifying key performance elements that enable desired outcomes.

Every organization should be able to identify those “oomph factors” that drive critical outcomes.  These performance elements are the key factors that determine strategic performance outcomes.  Assessment drives instruction, and in order to assess the effectiveness of your performance you must be able to identify the key factors that drive your performance.  (more…)

“The general who wins the battle makes many calculations in his temple before the battle is fought. The general who loses makes but few calculations beforehand.” – Sun Tzu

Posted by: Elizabeth on December 1, 2011

Business is doing battle every day; most days the battle is within our organizations as we strive to continuously improve capacity and performance.  In Mass Destruction, T.J. LeCain explains that the ability to control, manage, and better understand complex systems “demands some means of taking its measure and mapping its essential characteristics.”  Measuring and mapping are complementary and co-dependant – mapping creates a model or framework of the systems that then guides measurement efforts.  Jerry Harbour, PhD outlines a top-down, model-based approach that begins by constructing a conceptual model or framework of the system and then building measures and metrics into that system.   He breaks this method down into 3 steps: (more…)

Wegmans Has a Fit, Do You?

Posted by: Elizabeth on November 17, 2011

We all need to gain a sustainable and competitive advantage in every level of our organization, from people to business strategy. This means that someone else’s best practice may not be the best fit for you.  Wegmans Food Market Inc is a great example of a company that has responded to its low-margin, highly competitive industry by finding a unique best practice.  They recognized a need for exceptional customer service that they achieved through high employee satisfaction levels, and a culture of responsibility and community service.  Such strategic HRM practices ranked Wegmans in Fortune’s “100 Best Companies to Work For” in 2005. (more…)

Best Practice for Whom?

Posted by: Elizabeth on November 9, 2011

How many times in the past week have you used or read the term “best practices?”  We certainly are enamored of best practices; MBA students search for them in case studies, HR professionals read the journals and assure their organizations that they are indeed adopting them, and consultants come in and share them.  But surely not every best practice is a good fit for every organization?  While we do know this cannot be true, how much effort have we undertaken to ensure that the best practice we are pursing is actually what is best for a unique and individual organization? (more…)

We can’t all, and some of us don’t – Eeyore

Posted by: Amy on October 19, 2011

Failure is not a happy place. Sometimes we frown, shuffle around, turn our tail and limp home.  But the former CEO of Procter & Gamble is definitely not an Eeyore – he takes failure as an opportunity to get better.  In our last blog he shared 5 root causes of failure at P&G and today we will see how he leveraged that failure for proven future success.

After finding those five fundamental causes of failure, A.G. Lafley and his staff focused on each of those problems and what had to change.  They looked at what strategies needed to be in place, what processes should be created, and what benchmarks or interim measures would assure they were on track.  (more…)

Assessment Drives Instruction

Posted by: Elizabeth on October 12, 2011

Let’s face it, all trainers and facilitators work hard to deliver a compelling and successful program.  During the actual program delivery, the best facilitators know the material well and strive to make the learning process both beneficial and entertaining.  While we all enjoy the congratulatory “This was a great session, you rock!” comments, these are not the kind that truly inform our assessment of program delivery and content.  “But wait!” you cry, “I do give feedback, and I receive it, too!”  Yes, we as facilitators do receive feedback from our participants, both in real time and with participant evaluations.  But more must be done to avoid the 11th and final reason training programs fail:

Failure To Provide Feedback & Use Information About Results (more…)

Older Posts »

Brighter Strategies is Maryland, DC & Virginia's exclusive boutique organizational development (OD) consulting firm specializing in strategic planning, performance management,
process improvement, and leadership development for the non profit and public sectors, including human services and social services.

About Consulting Firm| Our Team | Advisory Board | Values | Careers | Non Profit Organizational Development Services | Strategic Planning Services | Process Improvement Services
Leadership Development Services | Human Resource (HR) Strategy | Process Improvement | Performance Improvement | Strategic Planning | Workshops for Social Services
Workshops for Human Services | Strategic Planning Process | Organizational Development Process |Strategic Planning Results | Organizational Development Results | Case Studies
Clients | Non Profit Resources | Social Services Resources | Human Services Resources | News & Events | Non Profit Development Tools | Contact Us

The Balanced Scorecard | Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument | Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

Organizational Development, non profits, social, human, services, md, va, dc

Baltimore • Washington, DC • DC Metro • DC • District of Columbia • Arlington, VA • Northern Virginia • Fairfax, VA • Alexandria, VA • Virginia, VA • Maryland, MD

Organizational Development, non profits, social, human, services, md, va, dc
A Alexandria-Fairfax-Virginia-Maryland-DC Area Business